Ellett Law Offices, P.C.

Since 1993, Ellett Law Offices has provided thousands of clients with quality bankruptcy attorney representation. Bankruptcy law is complicated but you will be guided through the process by a knowledgeable and experienced bankruptcy attorney.

Cannot Use 727 Claim to Uphold a 532 Claim Against Bankruptcy Estate

June 9, 2014 by  
Filed under Blog

Several bankruptcy courts have held that a creditor cannot settle a § 727 claim with a bankruptcy estate in order to obtain a § 523 claim against the bankruptcy estate. As explained by one court:

“a discharge in bankruptcy is not an appropriate element of a quid pro quo. Tying withdrawal of objections to discharge to settlement of other actions is contrary to public policy. Under no circumstances, not even where the intent is innocent, may a debtor purchase a repose from objections to discharge. A discharge in bankruptcy depends on the debtor’s conduct; it is not an object of a bargain.”

In re Moore, 50 B.R. 661, 664 (Bankr.E.D.Tenn.1985). Bankruptcy courts recognize that settlement of a § 727 claim can be improperly used in order for a creditor to obtain an advantage in the creditor’s § 523 claim. However, such a tactic is against public policy and attacks the bankruptcy process and its integrity. In re Vickers, 176 B.R. 287, 290 (Bankr. N.D. Ga. 1994). A creditor also violates its fiduciary duty when it settles a § 727 claim in favor of the creditor’s § 523 claim. In re de Armond, 240 B.R. 51, 56-57 (Bankr. C.D. Cal. 1999) (explaining a “creditor who joins a § 727 claim with a § 523 claim wears two hats:  a fiduciary hat for the § 727 claim, which is brought on behalf of all creditors, and an individual hat for the § 523 claim. In settling the litigation, the creditor may not disregard the fiduciary hat.”); see also In re Joseph, 121 B.R. 679, 682 (Bankr. N.D.N.Y. 1990) (“[T]he plaintiff who commences an adversary proceeding pursuant to Code § 727 . . . becomes the trustee of that action as it ‘inures to the benefit of all creditors’ . . . A creditor commencing an adversary proceeding based upon Code § 523 . . .  seeks to ‘vindicate only its own debt’ . . . A creditor’s withdrawal of an objection to discharge, therefore, is a unilateral act which affects all creditors.”).


Tell us what you're thinking...
and oh, if you want a pic to show with your comment, go get a gravatar!